Women overanalyze, men oversimplify

January 26, 2011 § 3 Comments

Colors, that is. It might be true biologically that men and women perceive the same colors visually. The way they name them, though? Well that’s another (gender? sociological?) story. The chart below, by Stephen Von Worley, shows how differently men and women process and name colors. On his website, Data Pointed, there is an interactive version of the chart.

His and Hers Colors

The chart includes vertical color zones (each “column” contains the same color variations). The larger the bubble, the more common the name used (i.e. “blue”, “red”). It also includes two large horizontal zones: the top contains names that women chose to describe colors, and the bottom names selected by men.

As can be seen, and as we all suspected, women overanalyze colors, whereas men oversimplify them.

Take the color pink, for example. Women name color variations such as: “salmon”, “neon pink”, “light mauve”, “bubblegum pink”, “baby pink”, “hot pink”, “fuschia” and “pepto bismol”.

Whereas for men life is simpler: there is “magenta”, “pink” and my favorite semantic concoction, “pinkish”.

Further proof that inter-gender communication can be a drag…

About these ads

Tagged: , , , , , , , , , ,

§ 3 Responses to Women overanalyze, men oversimplify

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading Women overanalyze, men oversimplify at it's a small web.

meta

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 271 other followers

%d bloggers like this: